By Benjamin Cuaresma
MANILA — President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has dismissed allegations that his administration is applying the law selectively, insisting that legal processes are being carried out independently despite criticism from the Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) over the impending plunder case against Senator Rodante Marcoleta.
Speaking to reporters before departing for an official visit to Vancouver, Canada, the President briefly addressed the religious group’s accusation that the government has been practicing “selective justice.”
“I believe they are mistaken,” Marcos said when asked to respond to the claim.
The INC recently organized mass gatherings in Quezon City and Manila, where participants voiced support for Marcoleta and criticized what they described as unequal enforcement of the law. The demonstrations also denounced what the group claimed was the misuse of the country’s justice system.
INC spokesperson Bro. Edwil Zabala earlier maintained that the church would continue speaking out even if Marcoleta eventually faces detention, saying the campaign extends beyond one individual and is intended to seek justice for Filipinos whom they believe have been wronged.
The controversy arose after Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla announced that his office was preparing to file a non-bailable plunder charge before the Sandiganbayan against Marcoleta over the alleged misuse of P75 million in campaign contributions.
Malacañang has likewise stood by the integrity of the administration’s anti-corruption efforts.
Palace Press Officer Claire Castro rejected accusations of political favoritism, pointing out that individuals associated with the administration have also been investigated, arrested, or prosecuted when evidence warranted legal action.
She argued that allegations of selective justice would only hold if government officials used their influence or authority to shield political allies from accountability—something she said has not occurred under the current administration.
The Marcos administration has repeatedly maintained that investigative agencies and prosecutors operate independently and that criminal cases are pursued based on available evidence rather than political affiliation.
ia/xf
